Samsung has given in recent years many of the most interesting in the world of tablets. He recently made his third generation of products in this format, bringing the startling novelty of opting for Intel Atom and ARM architecture abandon. In late 2012 Google built for its first 10-inch tablet that also gave processor. Let’s put a face to face both products to see their similarities and differences. Here’s a comparison between Galaxy Tab and Nexus 3 10.1 10 .
Design, size and weight
outward appearance these two teams are different at first glance, as a matter of color and brightness in the finish. However, the shape and volume are fairly similar, with similar dimensions and thickness and rounded edges. Although in the newer model has reduced the weight almost 100 grams.
Screen
demanded a high-flying display, and the Nexus 10 is. Its resolution and pixel density twice that of the Galaxy Tab 3 . The confusion over the level that Samsung has chosen for the third generation of their displays is widespread. In addition, the protective glass Corning Glass 2 we do have in the first just to close the scoring in this section.
Performance
benchmarks results that supposedly Samsung has recently made it clear that this is a really powerful chip. Are higher than that of Google , despite having it with 2GB of RAM. It is true that in the graphic aparatado, you need to move twice as many pixels than its rival. The chip dual-core Exynos 5 A15 that leads is interesting but there has been progress in this regard and it shows. However, multitasking double RAM could be noted in their favor.
Storage
Dan
the same internal storage options, but still do not know the price of the 32GB version of the Korean. The failure of Google is to obviate the SD card . This is done on all your devices, probably wanting to push their users to the cloud storage. For some this may be a negative factor.
Connectivity
mobile network connectivity
Here
of Google wins by having a rear camera most gifted. However, with respect to the speakers of the device has been some criticism. Not that bad but the grating sound behind which is actually appear to be much larger than the true dual stereo speakers that are located in the corners. The Samsung opts for something similar but without the visual trick and also with Dolby Surround.
Autonomy
The weight difference of the two tablets is explained with the difference in battery. The Nexus 10 is noticeably larger, but that screen spends far more than the other. From this if there is hard data and takes between 9 and 10 hours in use. From Tab 3 Samsung says 10 hours, but will have to check.
Price and conclusions
The price chosen by Samsung is very good. The great sacrifice we would be the screen, but otherwise have a truly complete tablet. If for us this is a fundamental aspect remains an option American great, with a very similar and pure Android experience. We also have the advantage that they always receive the first software updates.
Conversely, if we need a tablet to connect to the Internet at any time, Korea is a great option.
Ultimately, Nexus 10 gives us a big screen, we can also export to other majors with HDMI, pure Android software updated and better camera. Galaxy Tab 10.1 gives us three more performance, connectivity and more memory mobile networks.
| Nexus 10 | 10.1 Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 | Size | 263.9 x 177.6 x 8.9 mm | 243.1 x 176.1 x 8 mm | Display | 10 inches. WQXGA Corning Gorilla Glass 2 | WXVGA 10.1 inch TFT | Resolution | 2560 x 1600 (300 ppi) | 1280 x 800 (149.5 ppi) | Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8 mm | Weight | 603 grams | 510 grams | Operating System | Android 4.2 Jelly Bean | Android 4.2 Jelly Bean | Processor | Exynos 5250CPU: ARM dual-core A15 GhZ @ 1.7 GPU: Mali T604 | Intel Atom Z2560 (Clover Trail +) CPU: dual core @ 1,5 GHzGPU: Power VR SGX 544 MP2 | RAM | 2 GB | 1 GB | Memory | 16 GB / 32 GB | 16 GB / 32 GB | Extension | No | microSD 64 GB | Connectivity | WiFi 802.11 b / g / n, Bluetooth, NFC (Android Beam) | WiFi 802.11 b / g / n Dual Band / 4G LTE, WiFi Direct, WiFi Hotspot, Bluetooth 4.0, | Ports | MicroUSB, microHDMI, POGO Pin Charger, Jack 3.5 mm | miniUSB 2.0, 3.5 Jack, | Sound | rear Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers (Dolby Surround) 1 Microphone | House | 1.9 MPXTrasera 5 MPX Front (1080p video) | MPXTrasera 3.2 MPX Front 1.3 | Sensors | GPS, accelerometer, light sensor, gyroscope, compass and barometer | GPS, accelerometer, compass, magnetometer, proximity and light | Battery | 9000 mAh / 9 hours | 6,800 mAh – 10 hours | Price | 399 euros (16GB) $ 499 (32 GB) | 379 euros (16 GB WiFi) 509 euros (16 GB WiFi + 4G) |
No comments:
Post a Comment